ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026
Sodium ascorbate versus ascorbic acid in sepsis: a narrative review of emerging cardiovascular and neurological benefits.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Update on Osmotherapy in Acute Brain Injury: Current and Emerging Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pathological triad of perioperative acute kidney injury: renal microcirculatory hypoxia, mitochondrial damage, and immuno-metabolic reprogramming.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sepsis remains the leading cause of death in intensive care units globally, with catecholamine-resistant shock posing a persistent therapeutic challenge. Norepinephrine is the primary vasopressor used to treat hypotension in sepsis, but its efficacy is often limited by multifactorial loss of pressor responsiveness, including adrenergic receptor desensitisation, excess nitric oxide, systemic inflammation, and endothelial injury. Ascorbate (vitamin C) has emerged as a potential adjunct therapy because it supports endothelial function, reduces oxidative stress, activates the immune system and enhances endogenous vasopressor synthesis. Despite restoration of systemic hemodynamics with fluids and vasopressors, the frontal cortex remains particularly vulnerable to microcirculatory ischemia and hypoxia, contributing to sepsis-associated encephalopathy through hypoperfusion, hypoxia, hyperthermia, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and mitochondrial dysfunction, ultimately leading to neuronal injury and delirium. Plasma levels of ascorbate are profoundly depleted in sepsis and correlate with disease severity. Cerebral cortical neurons actively concentrate ascorbate at levels up to 250-fold higher than plasma, underscoring its importance in maintaining redox homeostasis and metabolism in the brain. While the conventional intravenous vitamin C formulation, ascorbic acid, has been associated with harm in clinical trials, emerging preclinical and early clinical data suggest that intravenous sodium ascorbate, a pH–neutral formulation of vitamin C, may restore noradrenaline sensitivity and re-establish frontal cortical microvascular perfusion and oxygenation. This review discusses the mechanistic rationale and therapeutic potential of sodium ascorbate in sepsis, including its ability to cross the blood-brain barrier. By stabilising cardiovascular and cerebrovascular function, sodium ascorbate may represent a promising adjunctive therapy to improve the management of sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.