Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41485572›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2026

Development and validation of dynamic clinical subphenotypes for acute pancreatitis using hematocrit and blood urea nitrogen trajectories in intensive care unit: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Jianhua Wan, Maobin Kuang, Shixuan Xiong, Yaoyu Zou, Huajing Ke, Wenhua He, Yin Zhu, Nonghua Lu, Liang Xia

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jianhua WanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: ndyfy07545@ncu.edu.cn.
Maobin KuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Shixuan XiongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Yaoyu ZouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Huajing KeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Wenhua HeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: hewenhua@ncu.edu.cn.
Yin ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: ndyfy01977@ncu.edu.cn.
Nonghua LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: lunonghua@ncu.edu.cn.
Liang XiaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China. Electronic address: xialiang79@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcute Pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal emergency in which early fluid therapy is critical, yet optimal strategies remain debated. Although Hematocrit (HCT) and Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) are recommended to guide fluid management, the prognostic value of their dynamic changes is unclear.

methodsThis multicenter retrospective cohort study utilized a development cohort from Jiangxi Province (n = 2027) and a validation cohort from the U.S. MIMIC-IV and eICU-CRD databases (n = 1381). Group-based multi-trajectory modeling (GBMTM) was applied to analyze the dynamic changes of HCT and BUN during the first week of ICU admission to identify distinct subphenotypes. Multivariate logistic regression and survival analysis were used to assess the association between each subphenotype and outcomes, including mortality and organ failure. The Boruta algorithm compared predictive importance.

resultsFive trajectory subphenotypes were identified: T1 (Renal Dysfunction Subphenotype, n = 287), T2 (Fluid-Responsive Subphenotype, n = 448), T3 (Volume-Deficient Subphenotype, n = 445), T4 (Stable Subphenotype, n = 516), and T5 (Hemodilution Subphenotype, n = 331). The T1 subphenotype had the highest mortality (36.6 % in the development cohort; adjusted OR = 16.27 (95 % CI 6.55-40.45) for in-hospital mortality in the validation cohort), while T4 had the lowest (2.7 %). Subphenotypes exhibited significantly different responses to fluid therapy: for T1, a fluid volume exceeding 4000 mL on the first day increased mortality risk; T3 tolerated a higher initial fluid load (up to 7000 mL on day one) but required fluid restriction on the second day. Consistent results in subgroup and sensitivity analyses demonstrated the robustness of this classification system.

conclusionThis study developed and validated a subphenotype classification system for the acute phase of AP based on the dynamic trajectories of HCT and BUN. It effectively distinguishes patient prognosis and responsiveness to fluid therapy, providing a crucial phenotypic framework for future randomized trials on individualized fluid management.

Indexed as

Blood Urea NitrogenPancreatitisAcute DiseaseAgedFemaleFluid TherapyHematocritHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePrognosisRetrospective StudiesAcute pancreatitisBlood urea nitrogenFluid therapyHematocritTrajectory

Identifiers

PMID41485572
PMCPMC13539224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.