ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Dynamic RBC-To-Membrane Ratio in
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo present a method for quantifying dissolved
methodsA spectroscopic sequence was performed in 45 subjects (27 healthy, 12 dyspnea of unknown origin [DUO], and 6 pulmonary hypertension [PH]) consisting of 499 pulse/acquire experiments. SVD was used to construct a low-noise approximation of FID data, and time-domain curve-fitting was performed on all free induction decays allowing calculation of RBC (218 ppm) and membrane (197 ppm) signal amplitudes and the RBC/membrane ratio. RBC/membrane oscillation amplitudes were assessed using independent t-tests. An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) test was performed to control for age and sex, followed by post hoc Tukey tests for pairwise comparisons.
resultsIndependent t-tests demonstrated statistically significant differences in RBC oscillation amplitudes and RBC/membrane oscillation amplitudes among healthy subjects and DUO patients (p-value = 0.003 and p-value = 0.0008, respectively). An ANCOVA test was performed to control for age and sex and resulted in statistically significant differences among diseases (p = 3.12 × 10
conclusionDynamic RBC-to-membrane ratio measurements may yield useful physiological information related to overall lung health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.