Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41486564›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of technology assessment in health care2026

Unloading the excess baggage: key informant interviews with Malaysian stakeholders on healthcare disinvestment initiatives.

Hanin Farhana Kamaruzaman, Eleanor Grieve, Evi Germeni, Habibah Kamaruzaman, Erni Zurina Romli, Ku Nurhasni Ku Abd Rahim, Izzuna Mudla Mohamed Ghazali, Sit Wai Lee, Mohammed Hirman Abdullah, Olivia Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hanin Farhana KamaruzamanHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), School of Health and Wellbeing, https://ror.org/00vtgdb53University of Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4926-5232
Eleanor GrieveHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), School of Health and Wellbeing, https://ror.org/00vtgdb53University of Glasgow, UK.
Evi GermeniHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), School of Health and Wellbeing, https://ror.org/00vtgdb53University of Glasgow, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5576-8816
Habibah KamaruzamanFaculty of Pharmacy, https://ror.org/00bnk2e50University Sultan Zainal Abidin (UNISZA), Malaysia.
Erni Zurina RomliMalaysian Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS), Medical Development Division, https://ror.org/05ddxe180Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Ku Nurhasni Ku Abd RahimMalaysian Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS), Medical Development Division, https://ror.org/05ddxe180Ministry of Health, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1603-3758
Izzuna Mudla Mohamed GhazaliMedical Development Division, https://ror.org/05ddxe180Ministry of Health, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-0485
Sit Wai LeeMalaysian Health Technology Assessment Section (MaHTAS), Medical Development Division, https://ror.org/05ddxe180Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Mohammed Hirman AbdullahMedical Development Division, https://ror.org/05ddxe180Ministry of Health, Malaysia.
Olivia WuHealth Economics and Health Technology Assessment (HEHTA), School of Health and Wellbeing, https://ror.org/00vtgdb53University of Glasgow, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to explore the perspectives on disinvestment of low-value care and interventions in Malaysia's healthcare system, with a focus on establishing the criteria for assessing disinvestment candidates, identifying potential barriers, and proposing strategies to improve the acceptance and effective implementation of disinvestment.

methodsBetween March and May 2023, we conducted online, semistructured interviews with seventeen Malaysian healthcare stakeholders with different professional roles at various levels of governance and decision making. Participants were recruited through a mix of purposive and snowballing sampling. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using inductive thematic approach in Atlas.ti.

resultsWe identified four major themes:

conclusionsMalaysian stakeholders viewed disinvestment as both an opportunity to improve resource allocation and a source of concern due to potential negative consequences and system readiness. This study identified strategies to support value-based assessment and implementation, underscoring the need for accountability and collaboration. Although current disinvestment efforts in Malaysia remain limited and undocumented, the thematic framework developed offers transferable insights and a structured lens for assessing readiness. These stakeholder-derived themes can guide other countries in designing transparent, equitable, and context-sensitive disinvestment processes.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareResource AllocationStakeholder ParticipationTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalDecision MakingHumansInterviews as TopicMalaysiaQualitative Researchdisinvestmentequitylow-value carequalitative researchstakeholder participation

Identifiers

PMID41486564
PMCPMC12835830

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.