Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41486707›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2026

Evaluating Isochoric Freezing as a Strategy for Storage of Red Blood Cells.

Yuanheng Zhao, Kaitlyn Wingnean, Nishaka William, Jason P Acker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuanheng ZhaoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9459-641X
Kaitlyn WingneanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nishaka WilliamDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Jason P AckerDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-827X

Funding

The Canadian federal government (Health Canada) and the provincial and territorial ministries of health.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Red blood cells (RBCs) are needed for life-saving blood transfusions, but they undergo continuous degradation during storage. Preserving RBCs for clinical transfusion remains a challenge due to storage-induced damage and limitations of traditional freezing methods. This study investigates isochoric freezing-a constant-volume, high-pressure cryopreservation technique that suppresses ice formation-as an alternative approach for RBC cryopreservation. RBC samples were preserved under isochoric freezing conditions at -2.5°C to -15°C with corresponding pressures of 31-156 MPa and a comparator supercooled control group. Hemolysis, cell count, morphology, and membrane integrity were assessed using hematological analyses, imaging flow cytometry, and dextran permeability assays. It is reported that hemolysis and morphological deterioration increased with decreasing temperature and rising pressure, with higher membrane damage compared to supercooling. Lower-temperature isochoric freezing resulted in loss of membrane integrity that was irreversible. While isochoric freezing minimized ice formation, elevated pressures adversely affected RBC viability. These findings highlight critical pressure-temperature thresholds necessary for optimizing isochoric freezing protocols for RBC preservation and inform future development of safer, long-term blood storage strategies.

Indexed as

Blood PreservationCryopreservationErythrocytesFreezingCell SurvivalHemolysisHumanscryopreservationisochoric freezingred blood cellssupercooling

Identifiers

PMID41486707
PMCPMC13003432

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.