ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2026
Evaluating Isochoric Freezing as a Strategy for Storage of Red Blood Cells.
Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Red blood cells (RBCs) are needed for life-saving blood transfusions, but they undergo continuous degradation during storage. Preserving RBCs for clinical transfusion remains a challenge due to storage-induced damage and limitations of traditional freezing methods. This study investigates isochoric freezing-a constant-volume, high-pressure cryopreservation technique that suppresses ice formation-as an alternative approach for RBC cryopreservation. RBC samples were preserved under isochoric freezing conditions at -2.5°C to -15°C with corresponding pressures of 31-156 MPa and a comparator supercooled control group. Hemolysis, cell count, morphology, and membrane integrity were assessed using hematological analyses, imaging flow cytometry, and dextran permeability assays. It is reported that hemolysis and morphological deterioration increased with decreasing temperature and rising pressure, with higher membrane damage compared to supercooling. Lower-temperature isochoric freezing resulted in loss of membrane integrity that was irreversible. While isochoric freezing minimized ice formation, elevated pressures adversely affected RBC viability. These findings highlight critical pressure-temperature thresholds necessary for optimizing isochoric freezing protocols for RBC preservation and inform future development of safer, long-term blood storage strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.