Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487270›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Adapting TeamSTEPPS for school mental health teams: development of an implementation research logic model.

Jordan Albright, Suzanne S Tham, Biiftu Duresso, Samantha Rushworth, Aparajita Biswas Kuriyan, Ricardo B Eiraldi, Courtney Benjamin Wolk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jordan AlbrightDepartment of Psychology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, United States.
Suzanne S ThamSchool of Social Policy & Practice, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Biiftu DuressoCenter for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Samantha RushworthCenter for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Aparajita Biswas KuriyanCenter for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Ricardo B EiraldiDepartment of Pediatrics and Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Courtney Benjamin WolkCenter for Mental Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

AHRQ HHS R18 HS026862
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Multidisciplinary school mental health (SMH) teams play a key role in delivering mental health services to children. However, poor workflow, inefficient communication, and limited resources, compromise SMH service delivery. Despite robust literature demonstrating the efficacy of team science interventions, such as the Team Strategies and Tools to Enhance Performance and Patient Safety (TeamSTEPPS), research on these interventions with SMH teams is limited. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews with SMH team members, teachers, and school administrators who had participated in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of TeamSTEPPS. Participants identified barriers and facilitators to implementation of the adapted TeamSTEPPS intervention, which were then organized according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). An Implementation Research Logic Model was developed, aligning implementation determinants with implementation strategies and proposed mechanisms by which the strategies impact outcomes. Results: Barriers to the successful implementation of the adapted TeamSTEPPS intervention included a lack of financing and resources, the intervention not being a relative priority, mission misalignment, poor work infrastructure to support, unmotivated innovation recipients and leaders, and insufficient planning. Proposed implementation strategies included providing dynamic training for leadership and SMH team members, centralizing technical assistance, development and distribution of educational materials, and ongoing consultation about implementation supports/when challenges arose, developing local policies that support implementation, establishing mandates for change, pruning competing initiatives, and providing reminders of strategies to school personnel. Proposed implementation outcomes (e.g., acceptability, feasibility), service outcomes (e.g., Observation of use of TeamSTEPPS strategies, Perceptions of teaming, Attitudes toward teamwork), and "client outcomes" (e.g., student service use, absences, suspensions, grade promotion) were also identified. Discussion: Lessons from the implementation process and recommendations for future directions are highlighted to inform the delivery and sustainment of team science interventions, such as TeamSTEPPS, for use with SMH teams.

Indexed as

determinantsimplementation research logic modelimplementation strategiesschool mental healthteam science

Identifiers

PMID41487270
PMCPMC12756162

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.