ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025
Bioactive feed additives in animal nutrition: bridging innovation, health, and sustainability.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Perceptions on the Economic Feasibility of Sustainable Roundworm Control Practices in Grazed Livestock-A Short Survey Among European Farmers and Veterinarians.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Effects of anVeterinary sciences · 2026Article
- Functional Effects of Dietary Grape By-Products on Rabbit Health, Performance, and Meat Quality.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Probiotics as antioxidant, antistress, and growth-enhancing agents in monogastric animals: a narrative review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal nutrition is shifting the focus from simply providing animals with feed to the nutrition of the whole system, balancing health, welfare, and ecological attention. This perspective synthesizes recent developments on bioactive feed additives (including phytogenic compounds, probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics, exogenous enzymes, organic acid, and emerging options such as algal extracts, bioactive peptides, and fermented substrates) and evaluates their contributions to sustainable production. The aim of this paper is to outline how these interventions can enhance digestive efficiency, gut integrity, immune competence, and resilience to stress, thereby working with the aim to reduce antibiotic use, improve feed conversion, lower emissions, and valorization of agro-industrial by-products within circular economy schemes. Furthermore, appraising persistent bottlenecks will be covered, such as: heterogeneous responses across species and production contexts, narrow dose-response windows and interactions among multiple actives, limited evidence on long-term safety and carry-over into edible products, and fragmented regulatory pathways. Finally, a forward agenda will be proposed, which leverages multi-omics to elucidate host-microbe-diet mechanisms and define biomarkers of response; applies precision feeding and digital monitoring to individualize dosing; designs multifunctional formulations with complementary modes of action; and embeds One Health and life-cycle assessment to balance efficacy, safety, and sustainability. Reframed as strategic tools rather than ancillary supplements, bioactives can help build resilient, resource-efficient animal production systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.