Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41487496›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2025

Intranasal delivery of iron chelators and management of central nervous system disease.

Ruiying Cheng, Jonghan Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Deferoxamine Improves Radiation-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruiying ChengDepartment of Biomedical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.
Jonghan KimDepartment of Biomedical and Nutritional Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain iron dyshomeostasis plays a critical role in the pathology of multiple central nervous system (CNS) disorders, including neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric diseases. Iron chelators such as deferoxamine (DFO) and deferiprone (DFP) have demonstrated therapeutic potential in mitigating disease progression in these conditions. However, systemic administration is hindered by poor blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability, dose-limiting toxicity, and poor patient compliance due to frequent dosing regimens. In recent years, intranasal (IN) drug delivery has emerged as a promising strategy to bypass the BBB, providing a direct nose-to-brain delivery route via olfactory and trigeminal pathways while minimizing systemic exposure. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the current status of iron chelation therapy for CNS disorders with a focus on pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and translational potential of IN administration. While IN DFO has been extensively studied in preclinical models of Alzheimer's disease and stroke, recent developments have expanded the scope to other chelators such as DFP. We compare traditional systemic routes, including oral and intravenous, with intranasal administration, highlighting their respective advantages and limitations for CNS delivery. With ongoing advances in formulation and delivery technologies, IN iron chelators provide a promising alternative for the treatment of CNS disorders characterized by impaired iron homeostasis in the brain.

Indexed as

blood-brain barrierbrain deliveryintranasal deliveryiron chelationneurodegenerative diseases

Identifiers

PMID41487496
PMCPMC12756509

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.