ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Evaluating the quality of educational TikTok videos on diabetic retinopathy: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Large language models for primary care ophthalmic education: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Popularity versus quality in TikTok educational videos on congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss among working-age adults, and enhancing public health literacy through effective education is crucial for its prevention and management. With the rise of mobile internet and short video platforms such as TikTok, new opportunities have emerged for disseminating medical knowledge. However, concerns remain regarding the accuracy and quality of this content. Methods: A cross-sectional search was conducted on September 18, 2025. A total of 200 Mandarin-language TikTok videos directly relevant to DR were included after screening. Baseline characteristics, uploader type, and user engagement metrics were extracted. Video quality was assessed independently by two trained reviewers using the DISCERN tool and the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V). Content coverage was evaluated against the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) Preferred Practice Pattern®. Inter-rater reliability was measured by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Group comparisons and correlation analyses were performed. Results: Significant differences were observed in quality scores across uploader categories (one-way ANOVA, Conclusion: The quality of DR-related educational short videos on TikTok varies widely, with the source of the video emerging as the key determinant. High-quality content from non-profit organizations and medical professional users not only demonstrates greater reliability but also fosters comprehensive health education. Strengthening professional participation, platform regulation, and evidence-informed communication strategies is essential to maximize the potential of short videos in DR health education and ultimately improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.