Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41488091›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Clinical efficacy and mechanisms of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation targeting the gut-brain axis for postoperative complications of aortic dissection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Bo Ning, Liangbin Yang, Yi Wei, Cheng Luo, Feisheng Zheng, Teng Ge, Haining Ou, Chaojie Wang, Jinlin Hu, Qingzuo Zhao and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Bo Ning *The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Liangbin Yang *The Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yi Wei *The Fourth Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Shenzhen, China.
Cheng LuoClinical Medical College, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Feisheng ZhengGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Teng GeThe Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Haining OuGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chaojie WangThe Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jinlin HuThe Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Qingzuo ZhaoThe Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jingyu BoThe Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Kai WangThe First Clinical Medical College, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Zhan ZhangThe First Clinical Medical College, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Hongyu ChenThe First Clinical Medical College, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Rongjun ZouThe Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaoping FanThe Second Clinical Medical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jihai PengGuangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Aortic dissection (AD) is a life-threatening cardiovascular emergency characterized by rapid onset and high mortality. While surgery intervention, the primary treatment, improves short-term survival, it frequently leads to postoperative complications including systemic inflammatory response syndrome, gastrointestinal dysfunction, and anxiety/depression. These complications may be exacerbated by dysregulation of the gut-brain axis (GBA). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is a non-invasive neuromodulation technique known to exert anti-inflammatory, prokinetic, and neuroregulatory effects in various conditions; however, its application for managing postoperative complications in AD remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of taVNS in regulating the GBA among postoperative AD patients through a randomized controlled trial. Methods: This is a single-center, randomized, investigator-blinded, sham-controlled randomized controlled trial. A total of 50 patients aged 18-75 years with postoperative Stanford Type A or B AD will be enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the active taVNS group or the sham control group. Both groups will receive standard postoperative care. The experimental group will additionally receive active taVNS targeting the vagus nerve-innervated auricular area (15 Hz, 200 μs pulse width), while the control group will receive sham stimulation at a non-vagus innervated site without electrical current. The intervention will be administered for 30 min, twice daily, over 7 consecutive days, with follow-up assessments continuing until 24 weeks post-surgery. Primary outcomes include changes in gut microbiota diversity/abundance and brain function (assessed via functional near-infrared spectroscopy). Secondary outcomes encompass inflammatory markers, plasma neurotransmitter levels, intestinal function recovery, and relevant psychometric scale scores. Safety will be monitored through vital signs, laboratory tests, and recording of any adverse events. Discussion: This study is the first to innovatively integrate taVNS with the GBA theory, investigating its multi-target mechanisms through a comprehensive set of biomarkers and clinical endpoints. If proven effective, taVNS could offer a safe and cost-effective non-pharmacological adjunctive therapy for managing postoperative complications in AD. Furthermore, the findings have the potential to elucidate the role of the GBA in the recovery trajectory of patients following major cardiovascular surgery. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, http://www.chictr.org.cn), No. ChiCTR2500102345, Date: May 13, 2025.

Indexed as

aortic dissectiongut-brain axispostoperative complicationsrandomized controlled trialtranscutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41488091
PMCPMC12756893

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.