ReviewCureus2025
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Incidence of Myocarditis and Guillain-Barré Syndrome in Adolescents Receiving COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy of intra-operative brain tumor squash cytology compared to large excision biopsy: a comparative study at the University Teaching Hospital of Kigali (CHUK), Rwanda.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025Article
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome Presenting With New-Onset Heart Failure.Journal of investigative medicine high impact case reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk of rare long-term adverse events, specifically myocarditis and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), in adolescents (12-19 years) following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Scopus, supplemented by trial registries and reference lists (PROSPERO: CRD420251045173). Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case-control studies, self-controlled case series, and pharmacovigilance database analyses reporting myocarditis or GBS outcomes in adolescents receiving BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273. The search was conducted in June 2025, and all published studies were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, or adapted criteria for pharmacovigilance studies. Effect measures were expressed as incidence rate or incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Myocarditis incidence was elevated in adolescent and young adult males, particularly after the second dose. Pooled analyses indicated a higher risk with mRNA-1273 compared to BNT162b2 (pooled IRR ≈ 3.9), although heterogeneity was very high (I² > 95%). For GBS, global pharmacovigilance data suggested only a modest association with mRNA vaccines (ROR 9.66), substantially weaker than for adenoviral vector or influenza vaccines. COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in adolescents is associated with a small but measurable increased risk of myocarditis, particularly in males, after the second dose, with a higher incidence following mRNA-1273. No consistent evidence of increased GBS risk was observed. Absolute risks remain low, and outcomes are generally favorable compared to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Continued surveillance and long-term follow-up are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.