ArticleJSES international2026
Humeral retrotorsion corrected glenohumeral external rotation deficits are present in medial ulnar collateral ligament injured and uninjured college baseball players.
Article in JSES international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glenohumeral rotational motion should be interpreted within the context of relative humeral retrotorsion (rHRT). To date, no study has investigated shoulder rotational motion within the context of rHRT in a medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL)-injured population. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if there were differences in HRT-corrected rotational motion between MUCL-injured and uninjured college baseball players. Methods: Thirty-five baseball players diagnosed with an MUCL injury were matched with 35 uninjured controls. Glenohumeral external rotation (GER) and internal rotation (GIR), as well as anatomic HRT, were collected on both arms. Data reduction was performed for all objective rotational motions and anatomic HRT, which was used to quantify rHRT. rHRT was then used to calculate HRT-corrected GER and HRT-corrected GIR. Outcomes were compared between groups using multivariate analysis of covariance, controlling for baseline cohort differences. Results: Results indicated no significant multivariate effects of cohort, body mass index, or level of competition on HRT-corrected GER or GIR (all Pillai's Trace Conclusion: HRT-corrected GER deficits are more prevalent than HRT-corrected GIR deficits in both cohorts. These findings continue to highlight the importance of accounting for osseous adaptations in range of motion measurements, as GIR deficit is not as common as previously thought.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.