ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026
Patient-reported, psychosocial and health economic outcomes in mild to moderate Friedreich's ataxia: baseline results of the PROFA study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cerebellar cognitive-affective syndrome in Friedreich Ataxia.Journal of neurology · 2026Observational
- A Patient-Reported Outcome Measure of Communication Difficulties in Friedreich Ataxia: COMATAX.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Friedreich ataxia (FA) is the most common autosomal recessive ataxia. Little attention has been paid to FA's impact on patient-reported, psychosocial, and health-economic outcomes. This study aimed to report these outcomes across FA's disability stages 1-5. Methods: We assessed patients in Germany, France, and Austria as part of the PROFA study, a European multicenter observational study. The protocol included a study center visit followed by a remote mobile assessment capturing ataxia severity (SARA), daily living deficits (FARS-ADL), cognitive and affective impairments (CCAS), health-related quality of life (HRQoL: PROM-Ataxia short-form, EQ-5D-5L), mental well-being (WEMWBS), communication disabilities (COMATAX), and healthcare and informal care utilization. FARS disability stages were used to demonstrate outcomes with effect size measures (Eta-Squared, Cramér's V). Multivariate regression models evaluated associations between z-standardized outcomes and disability stages. Findings: One hundred one patients (mean [SD]: age 35.0 [11.5]; GAA-repeat size 657 [299]; 50.5% women) were included. Activities of daily living, HRQoL, communication disabilities, and informal care utilization worsened significantly across disability stages with moderate to high effect sizes. Cognitive-affective impairments and mental well-being showed significant associations with small effect sizes. Twenty-three patients (33.3%) received formal care, while 40 (58.0%) received informal care (mean 12.2 h/week). Omaveloxolone was used by 33 patients (32.7%). Annual healthcare costs excluding Omaveloxolone were €13,620 (payer) and €32,679 (societal perspective, including informal care and productivity losses). Interpretation: The results emphasize the multidimensional patient, societal, and economic burden of FA and the need for comprehensive care addressing physical, mental, and psychosocial health. Funding: European Joint Programme on Rare Diseases (EJP RD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.