ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting progression-free survival after immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Multi-Modal Biomarkers for Immunotherapy Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: ctDNA, Microbiome, and Radiomics.Cancers · 2026Review
- A multimodal radiomics model to predict disease-free survival in resected non-small cell lung cancer: integrating clinicopathology, dual-energy CT, and deep learning features.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Explainable deep learning approaches and clinical insights for cancer biomarker identification.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to develop and validate an interpretable machine learning model that harnesses circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to predict progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing immunotherapy, thereby addressing the inherent limitations of conventional biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden. Methods: This multicenter study involved pretreatment ctDNA profiling of 441 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), stratified into three independent cohorts: a training set (n=303, OAK trial), a validation set (n=97, POPLAR trial), and a local test set (n=41, multicenter retrospective cohort, 2023-2024). Using 5-fold cross-validated LASSO-Cox (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator-Cox Proportional Hazards) regression, 25 prognostic genomic features were identified for integration into an eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) model. Model performance was systematically evaluated via three approaches: (1) discrimination metrics, including AUC with 95% confidence intervals, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity; (2) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis complemented by log-rank testing; and (3) SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpreting feature importance. Results: The model exhibited robust predictive performance, with AUCs of 0.82 (training cohort), 0.79 (validation cohort), and 0.77 (test cohort). Key genomic predictors included TP53 mutations, which were associated with shorter PFS, and BRCA2 mutations, which correlated with longer PFS. SHAP analysis identified NOTCH1 as a novel predictive biomarker, whose feature contribution profile suggests a role in immune modulation in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Risk stratification significantly distinguished PFS outcomes (log-rank Conclusion: This study establishes a robust, interpretable ctDNA-derived machine learning algorithm for predicting PFS in NSCLC patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors. The identification of TP53, BRCA2, and NOTCH1 as biologically plausible predictive biomarkers advances understanding of immunotherapy response mechanisms and enables clinically actionable risk stratification to guide therapeutic decision-making. These findings underscore the need for prospective multicenter validation to facilitate translation into precision oncology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.