ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Development and validation of a multi-modality system combining radiomics and deep learning for predicting mid-pregnancy complications and enabling timely pregnancy care.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus and preeclampsia: a systematic review of machine learning models and clinical decision support systems.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To improve the early prediction of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), we developed and validated an artificial intelligence (AI) model. This initiative was driven by the insufficient accuracy of current clinical tools. Our study aimed to determine whether integrating radiomics and deep learning features from first-trimester ultrasound scans could enhance predictive performance. Methods: A total of 213 pregnant women who underwent ultrasound at 8 weeks of gestation were enrolled. Clinical data, radiomics features, and deep learning features were collected. Imaging features were selected using LASSO regression. Four predictive models were developed: a clinical model, a radiomics model, a deep learning model, and a fusion model combining all feature types. Model performance was evaluated on an independent test set using metrics including AUC, sensitivity, specificity, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Results: In the training cohort, all models demonstrated excellent discriminatory ability, with the combined model achieving the highest AUC of 0.987 (95% CI: 0.9733-0.9999), followed by the DLR model (AUC = 0.985). The clinical model (AUC = 0.941) and radiomics model (AUC = 0.939) also performed well. In the test cohort, the combined model maintained superior performance with an AUC of 0.963 (95% CI: 0.9152-1.0000), significantly outperforming all single-modality models. Overall, the combined model exhibited optimal and stable predictive performance across both training and test datasets. Discussion: This enables accurate early prediction of HDP and GDM. This non-invasive tool supports tailored prenatal care, with potential to improve outcomes. Further validation in diverse groups is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.