SynthesisFrontiers in physiology2025
Clinical efficacy of exercise in the treatment of post-COVID-19 syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exercise and Cardiovascular Risk Modulation in Post-COVID Syndrome.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Post-COVID-19 syndrome (PCS) describes a constellation of persistent or new symptoms lasting beyond the acute phase of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerging evidence suggests that exercise is a cost-effective and accessible intervention that may enhance pulmonary function, improve cardiopulmonary circulation, regulate emotional status, and alleviate symptoms of PCS. However, robust evidence supporting the efficacy of exercise therapy in PCS remains limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the therapeutic potential of exercise therapy in PCS. Method: A search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Ovid databases up to March 25, 2025 yielded 33 randomized controlled trials (with 2,895 participants) for meta-analysis. Result: The results showed that exercise therapy significantly improved the multi-dimensional outcomes of patients with PCS. Bayesian network meta-analysis indicated that the combination of aerobic exercise and respiratory muscle training had the best effect on lung function. Multimodal exercise significantly improved the results of the six-minute walk test, the dyspnea score, and peak oxygen uptake. Mental Health and Mental Component Summary scores improved significantly in the group that received exercise therapy (P<0.01). Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis confirm that exercise can significantly improve quality of life and the emotional state of patients with PCS. They also provide evidence for a treatment strategy in patients with post-COVID-19 sequelae. Systematic Review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/#myprospero, identifier CRD420251034187.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.