Trial reportClinical pharmacokinetics2026
Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling to Support Molar Dose Ratio Determination of Long-Acting Insulin Analogs.
Trial report in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveINS068 is a new soluble, long-acting insulin analog intended to cover basal insulin requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The purpose of this study was to determine the molar dose ratio of INS068 to insulin degludec (IDeg) by comparing the clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles of INS068 and IDeg. The PD endpoints include glucose infusion rate (GIR) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).
methodPopulation pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PopPK/PD) analysis was performed to characterize INS068 and IDeg PK and PD profiles. Data from 307 subjects across three Phase I studies and one Phase II study were used to establish the population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model, of which two euglycemic clamp (Phase I) studies were used to establish PopPK-GIR model, and one Phase II study was used to establish PopPK-HbA1c model. Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to investigate the PK and PD relationships of INS068 and IDeg. Model-based simulations were performed to determine the molar dose ratio of INS068 to IDeg.
resultsThe PopPK model of INS068 and IDeg was described by a one-compartment model with linear absorption with a lag time and elimination. Significant covariate effects of body weight, population, and treatment (INS068 vs IDeg) were identified for PK parameters of INS068 and IDeg. However, except for body weight and T2DM patients, the other significant covariates (treatment and T1DM patients) had no clinically relevant effects on PK exposures. The relationship between GIR and insulin concentrations in effect compartment was described by a direct response model with sigmoidal E
conclusionThis analysis supported molar dose ratio of INS068 to IDeg as 1. INS068 had similar potency compared to IDeg, with one unit of INS068 composed of 6 nmol of active ingredient (1 U = 6 nmol).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41489799What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.