Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490107›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Barriers to Buprenorphine Initiation in Patients Using Fentanyl.

Sarah S Kawasaki, Jane M Liebschutz, Cristina Murray-Krezan, Galen E Switzer, Samantha Nash, Kwonho Jeong, Erin L Winstanley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarah S KawasakiPenn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Jane M LiebschutzDivision of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Cristina Murray-KrezanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Galen E SwitzerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Samantha NashDivision of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kwonho JeongDivision of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Erin L WinstanleyDivision of General Internal Medicine, Center for Research on Health Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Anecdotal accounts suggest an increase in problems initiating buprenorphine (BUP) treatment among individuals using illicitly manufactured fentanyl. Limited empirical data illuminate these challenges. Objective: To determine the prevalence of clinician-reported problems initiating BUP treatment among patients using fentanyl and describe clinical strategies used to overcome engagement challenges. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this survey study, an online survey was pilot tested and refined with a convenience sample of physicians. The final survey included 96 items and took less than 15 minutes to complete. The survey queried patients' use of fentanyl, BUP induction problems (precipitated or prolonged withdrawal), strategies to overcome induction problems, clinician characteristics, and practice characteristics. Eligible clinicians initiated BUP for at least 10 patients with opioid use disorder in the past year and at least 1 patient in the past 90 days. The survey was live from June 2, 2023, to March 18, 2024. Main Outcome and Measures: The main outcome of interest was precipitated and/or prolonged opioid withdrawal. Descriptive statistics are reported, and logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with BUP initiation problems. Results: A random sample of physicians and advanced practice clinicians in the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) registrant dataset from October 2022 (n = 3141) were invited to participate; of 2485 eligible for inclusion, 649 (26.1%) completed the prescreen survey. Of 421 (64.9%) eligible to complete the survey, the final sample included 396 (94.1%) clinicians who completed at least 50% of the survey items. Of 390 participants, 284 (72.8%) reported problems when initiating BUP in patients using fentanyl, with 242 of 394 (61.4%) reporting patients' experiencing precipitated withdrawal. A total of 264 or 392 participants (67.3%) reported modifying their standard induction procedures, changing how they counsel patients, or changing both medication and counseling protocols. In multivariable modeling, clinicians were more likely to report problems initiating BUP in patients if they had a DEA waiver to treat more than 100 patients (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.08-3.40), vs those waivered to treat fewer patients; if they reported at least 75% of their patients using fentanyl (OR, 6.31; 95% CI, 2.59-15.35), vs no patients; or if they inducted patients in noninpatient settings (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.39-5.61), vs inpatient settings. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of clinician-reported problems initiating BUP treatment, clinicians working in high-volume noninpatient settings reported more problems initiating BUP in patients using fentanyl, and many reported changing their clinical practices in response to these problems. Further research is warranted to match alternate BUP induction strategies by clinical settings.

Indexed as

BuprenorphineFentanylNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultAnalgesics, OpioidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeSurveys and QuestionnairesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineFentanylNarcotic Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID41490107
PMCPMC12771233

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.