ArticlePloS one2026
One health approach to Balantioides coli: Molecular and metabarcoding evidence of zoonotic transmission.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastrointestinal Parasites in Pigs in Southern Mozambique: Prevalence, Diversity and Their Importance in Public and Animal Health.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From farm to flask: stable genotypes and shifting microbiomes in the ecological dynamics of Balantioides coli from a One Health perspective.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- First molecular detection and phylogenetic characterization of Balantioides coli in lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris).Parasitology research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Balantioides coli is a neglected zoonotic protozoan, with pigs recognized as its main reservoirs. In tropical countries such as Brazil, information on balantidiasis in occupationally exposed human populations remains limited. In this context, this study investigated the occurrence of B. coli and other intestinal parasites in pig farmers, their families, and pigs from the same farms, while also exploring associations with sanitary conditions and the gut microbiota. Fecal samples from 47 humans and 15 pigs from family-owned and industrial farms in Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais, Brazil, were analyzed. General and sanitary information was obtained through structured questionnaires. Samples were examined by microscopy, and B. coli was identified by PCR targeting ITS1-5.8S-ITS2, followed by Sanger sequencing. The gut microbiota was characterized using 18S and 16S rRNA (V3/V4) molecular markers for metabarcoding. Among the 47 participants, seven (14.9%) tested positive for B. coli nucleotide sequences in their fecal material, with most of them (71.4%) being adult males directly involved in pig handling. Phylogenetic analysis revealed genetic variants A0, B0, and atypical strains shared between humans and pigs from the same farm. Eukaryotic parasites (B. coli, Blastocystis spp., Entamoeba spp.) and prokaryotic groups (Firmicutes, Bacteroidota, and potentially pathogenic bacteria) were also shared across hosts, and two human-pig pairs (H31-129F and H70-565F) exhibited highly similar microbial profiles. This study provides the first molecular evidence of B. coli in pig farmers in Brazil, reinforcing the epidemiological role of pigs in zoonotic transmission. These findings highlight the need for improved sanitation, consistent use of personal protective equipment, and continuous molecular surveillance under a One Health perspective to minimize transmission of this parasite.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.