ArticlePloS one2026
Improved birth rates via rehydration of mouse freeze-dried spermatozoa using high-temperature ultrapure water.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Monosodium glutamate protects DNA of freeze-dried somatic cells and improves development of somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026Article
- Hyperosmotic HEPES-CZB Enhances Post-ICSI Survival of C57BL/6N Mouse Oocytes.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freeze-drying (FD) is a promising method for achieving the long-term, low-cost, and safe preservation of mammalian sperm at room temperature (RT, 23-25°C). However, the birth rate of embryos fertilized with FD sperm is reduced to less than half compared to those fertilized with fresh sperm. Moreover, the underlying causes and potential solutions remain unclear. In this study, we investigated a rehydration process using FD sperm to determine its effects on sperm DNA damage. We also attempted to optimize this rehydration method to improve birth rates. We initially examined the effects of slowing water infiltration into mouse FD sperm using a high osmolarity or viscosity solution, but we found that this increased DNA damage and decreased birth rates. Next, to accelerate infiltration speed, we performed rehydration of FD sperm using ultrapure water heated up to as hot as 90°C. However, we found that the DNA damage of the FD sperm decreased as the temperature increased. The level of DNA damage in the male pronucleus at the zygote stage and of abnormal chromosome segregation (ACS) at the two-cell stage were also decreased at 37°C or 50°C. Finally, the birth rates of embryos derived from FD sperm also significantly improved when rehydration was performed using 50°C ultrapure water (37%) compared with the RT control (22%). Taken together, the results of this study demonstrate that the DNA of FD sperm can be damaged during the rehydration process and that rapid rehydration significantly improves the birth rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.