ReviewZhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences2026
[Advances in injectable and transdermal glucose-responsive insulin delivery systems].
Review in Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Glucose-Responsive Nanomedicine in Diabetes Therapy: Emerging Advances and Clinical Prospects.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To address the core limitations of conventional insulin therapy, including delayed glycemic control and the frequent risk of hypoglycemia, the development of glucose-responsive insulin delivery systems capable of dynamically sensing blood glucose levels and releasing insulin on demand has emerged as a pivotal strategy. Based on their underlying sensing mechanisms, these systems are generally classified into three categories: those utilizing glucose oxidase, glucose-binding molecules, and phenylboronic acid. From the perspective of administration routes, injectable and transdermal delivery are the two primary approaches for glucose-responsive insulin. Injectable glucose-responsive insulin delivery systems are highly compatible with existing clinical practices, primarily relying on glucose-responsive carriers to regulate the insulin release rate and achieve stable and efficient bioavailability. Transdermal glucose-responsive insulin delivery systems utilize glucose-responsive microneedle arrays to penetrate the skin stratum corneum and precisely control the rate of insulin release, allowing for sufficient insulin delivery under almost painless conditions. This review systematically summarizes recent advances in both injectable and transdermal glucose-responsive insulin delivery systems, with a focus on carrier design strategies, glucose-responsive release mechanisms, and evolutionary pathways of preparation techniques. It also highlights the contributions of these systems toward improved glucose-responsiveness, therapeutic safety, biocompatibility, and patient adherence. Furthermore, challenges and future prospects for clinical translation are discussed. This overview is expected to provide valuable insights for further research and development in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.