ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026
Translating Science to Improve Health-a Report from the "Agriculture and Diet: Value Added for Nutrition, Translation, and Adaptation in a Global Ecology" (ADVANTAGE) Project Working Group 5.
Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intersection of Climate and Environmental Change and Priority Health Outcomes Across the Life Course: Working Group 1 Report from the "Agriculture and Diet: Value Added for Nutrition, Translation, and Adaptation in a Global Ecology" (ADVANTAGE) Project.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
- Translating Science to Improve Health-a Report from the "Agriculture and Diet: Value Added for Nutrition, Translation, and Adaptation in a Global Ecology" (ADVANTAGE) Project Working Group 5.Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transforming food systems to improve health amidst accelerating climate and environmental change is a critical global challenge. This paper addresses the imperative and complexity of translating scientific evidence into actionable policies and practices at the climate-food-health nexus. We propose a conceptual and operational framework grounded in ecological systems thinking, highlighting the interdependencies across biological, social, and economic domains. Drawing on existing translational science models from public health, environmental health, and convergent food systems research, we distill 5 core principles for effective translation: 1) integration of transdisciplinary evidence across scales; 2) early and sustained engagement with policymakers, practitioners, and affected communities; 3) contextually nuanced application of evidence; 4) systematic identification of tradeoffs, conflicts of interest, and unintended consequences; and 5) strategic communication that bridges knowledge and action. To illustrate these principles, we analyze 5 case studies spanning local, national, and global contexts. Each illustrates the pragmatic and political dimensions of evidence translation, including stakeholder alignment, data infrastructure, and institutional leadership. This paper underscores the need for adaptive governance, cross-sectoral convergence, and innovative implementation science to advance food systems that are resilient, equitable, and sustainable. Our recommendations are intended to inform researchers, decision-makers, and practitioners seeking to enact evidence-informed change in dynamic sociopolitical environments and diverse food systems contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.