Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41490777›Full record

ReviewAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2026

Translating Science to Improve Health-a Report from the "Agriculture and Diet: Value Added for Nutrition, Translation, and Adaptation in a Global Ecology" (ADVANTAGE) Project Working Group 5.

Donald Rose, Wendi Gosliner, Jennifer J Otten, Christina A Roberto, Selena Ahmed, Patrick Webb, Daniel J Raiten, Jessica Fanzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Donald RoseDepartment of Social, Behavioral, and Population Sciences, Celia Scott Weatherhead School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, United States. Electronic address: diego@tulane.edu.
Wendi GoslinerNutrition Policy Institute, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, United States.
Jennifer J OttenFood Systems, Nutrition, and Health Program, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Christina A RobertoDepartment of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Selena AhmedThe Periodic Table of Food Initiative (PTFI), American Heart Association, Dallas, TX, United States.
Patrick WebbFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, United States.
Daniel J RaitenOffice of Nutrition Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States.
Jessica FanzoColumbia Climate School, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transforming food systems to improve health amidst accelerating climate and environmental change is a critical global challenge. This paper addresses the imperative and complexity of translating scientific evidence into actionable policies and practices at the climate-food-health nexus. We propose a conceptual and operational framework grounded in ecological systems thinking, highlighting the interdependencies across biological, social, and economic domains. Drawing on existing translational science models from public health, environmental health, and convergent food systems research, we distill 5 core principles for effective translation: 1) integration of transdisciplinary evidence across scales; 2) early and sustained engagement with policymakers, practitioners, and affected communities; 3) contextually nuanced application of evidence; 4) systematic identification of tradeoffs, conflicts of interest, and unintended consequences; and 5) strategic communication that bridges knowledge and action. To illustrate these principles, we analyze 5 case studies spanning local, national, and global contexts. Each illustrates the pragmatic and political dimensions of evidence translation, including stakeholder alignment, data infrastructure, and institutional leadership. This paper underscores the need for adaptive governance, cross-sectoral convergence, and innovative implementation science to advance food systems that are resilient, equitable, and sustainable. Our recommendations are intended to inform researchers, decision-makers, and practitioners seeking to enact evidence-informed change in dynamic sociopolitical environments and diverse food systems contexts.

Indexed as

AgricultureDietTranslational Research, BiomedicalTranslational Science, BiomedicalClimate ChangeEcologyFood SupplyGlobal HealthHumansPublic Healthclimate changeconvergencefood systemspublic healthtranslation

Identifiers

PMID41490777
PMCPMC12924183

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.