ReviewNature reviews. Urology2026
Implantable pelvic neurostimulators to restore erectile function: from concept to practice.
Review in Nature reviews. Urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quest for therapeutics to manage erectile dysfunction has evolved in the past few decades, with attention now directed towards interventions that facilitate and retain natural erectile ability. Electrical neurostimulation of the penis is a technique that could meet this objective. Although only in the early stages of development, this intervention could act as an authentic restorative therapy, targeting the penile-nerve supply that is impaired by disease states, injury or ageing. The concept is in accordance with well-substantiated neuromodulatory management approaches to erectile dysfunction, aimed at promoting neuronal integrity and function of the nerves, which are essential for regulating penile erections. The use of this technique is supported by intensive research over the past 150 years, from early experimental observations of erection responses following electrical stimulation of pelvic nerves to contemporary clinical investigations showing recovery of erection after implantation of pelvic neurostimulators in men with spinal-cord injury or undergoing radical prostatectomy. Thus, this therapy could be considered an emerging subspecialty, spanning the establishment of the neuroregulatory basis of penile erection and the invention of technologies that capitalize on the science of pelvic neurophysiology. The clinical use of penile neurostimulation could, therefore, offer a revolutionary new therapeutic approach in the field of sexual medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491267What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.