ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Evaluating ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 for Patient Education in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Radiotherapy: a Comparative Analysis.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is one of the most common head and neck tumors and is particularly prevalent in certain geographical regions, especially Southeast Asia. Radiotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment; however, patients often exhibit misconceptions due to limited health literacy, which may compromise treatment adherence and outcomes. Large language models (LLMs) provide a novel approach to patient education, yet their reliability and readability in the context of radiotherapy for NPC have not been systematically evaluated. In July 2025, we conducted a comparative evaluation of ChatGPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 in addressing educational questions related to NPC radiotherapy. The DISCERN instrument was used to assess response quality and reliability, while text readability was measured using the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI). Statistical analyses were performed using RStudio (v4.2.2). Both models achieved overall DISCERN scores of 51-62, indicating a "good" quality rating, with strengths in relevance and neutrality. However, deficiencies were noted in the areas of evidence currency, guideline references, and long-term side effects. DeepSeek-R1 demonstrated significantly higher readability compared with ChatGPT-4o, with a 25.6% reduction in FKGL and a 27% decrease in mean sentence length, making it more accessible for populations with limited health literacy. LLMs show substantial potential in supporting patient education for NPC radiotherapy, particularly by enhancing readability. Nonetheless, current models remain limited in terms of source transparency and completeness of clinical details. Future development should incorporate multimodal educational formats, real-time guideline integration, and structured output templates to further improve information reliability and patient support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491281What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.