ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Development and iterative optimization of an independently usable assistance system to assess, maintain and improve the nutritional and mobility status of older adults: an iterative usability study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Digital Assistive System for Maintaining Nutrition and Mobility in Older Adults: Usability and Feasibility Findings From a Pilot Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPromoting a balanced diet and regular physical activity is crucial for maintaining independence in old age. Technical assistance systems can help identify nutritional and mobility deficits and initiate appropriate interventions. We are developing a technical assistance system consisting of a measurement and training station and a tablet-based app (AS-Tra). AS-Tra is specifically designed for independent use by participants aged ≥ 70 years to assess and improve their nutritional and mobility status.
objectiveThis study aimed to identify optimization potentials of the AS-Tra system together with members of the target group through iterative test cycles until good usability is achieved.
methodsThe system is developed as a complex intervention in accordance with the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework and assessed in three iterative cycles for its usability. In each cycle, participants carried out structured predefined tasks. To capture their cognitive process, they were asked to ‘think aloud’. These thoughts were recorded with the necessary support for completing each task. Usability was measured using the System Usability Scale (SUS). Improvements based on the results were made. In the third cycle, independent use was simulated by leaving the participants alone in the lab, receiving tasks via audio instructions and observing them via webcams and eye-tracking glasses.
resultsA total of 34 participants (78.60 ± 5.59 years, 70.93% female) were included in the three iterative cycles (C1–C3). The SUS score improved from 70.63 to 84.55 between C1 and C2 and decreased slightly to 78.18 at C3. Overall 63.11% of the tasks (n = 385) were completed without support. In 14.92% (n = 91) of all tasks, the task could be completed by repeating or rephrasing instructions, 20.33% (n = 124) with direct reference to the solution, and 1.15% (n = 7) of all tasks could not be completed independently.
conclusionsThe results of the cycles made it possible to develop an independently usable system for assessing the nutritional and mobility situations of older people with good usability. Additionally, the relevance of support functions and the importance of research under real conditions became clear. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS), DRKS00031719, registered May 2023, https://drks.de/search/de/trial/DRKS00031719 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.