Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491470›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical imaging2026

Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in medical imaging: a systematic review of techniques, applications, and challenges.

Fahad Ahmed, Naila Sammar Naz, Sunawar Khan, Ateeq Ur Rehman, Waleed M Ismael, Muhammad Adnan Khan

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fahad AhmedSchool of Computer Science, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Naila Sammar NazSchool of Computer Science, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Sunawar KhanSchool of Computer Science, National College of Business Administration and Economics, Lahore, 54000, Pakistan.
Ateeq Ur RehmanComputer Science and Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Waleed M IsmaelDepartment of Information Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Azal University for Human Development, Sanaa, Yemen. Waleed.m@auhd.edu.ye.
Muhammad Adnan KhanDepartment of Software, Faculty of Artificial Intelligence and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam-si, 13557, Republic of Korea. adnan@gachon.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is crucial for enhancing transparency and trustworthiness, as well as for developing AI-based diagnostic systems in medical imaging to achieve clinical acceptability and reliability. This synthesis aligns with the current context of XAI in medical imaging on four key dimensions: trends in techniques, their application to clinical use cases or with human subjects, and the associated problems. In radiology and pathology, we report on image analysis based on current literature from credible databases. This review extends on the existing surveys by explicitly addressing the focus on feature selection (FS), graph neural networks (GNNs), and multimodal transformers and combining them to a cohesive XAI taxonomy and matches the techniques to the specific impact points in the clinical workflow in radiology and pathology. We present saliency maps, attention mechanisms, and gradient-based and rule-based elucidations of deep learning (DL) models in today’s healthcare environment. Finally, the results show that XAI significantly enhances overall clinical decision-making by making the high-level reasoning of the model readily available to users, thereby increasing their confidence in clinical decisions despite the remaining obstacles, including standardization, interpretability, data bias, and complicated data integration. From 980 records, 289 duplicates were removed, 691 screened, 209 excluded, 482 full texts assessed, 263 excluded with 219 yielding 133 included studies. Exploring this third dimension within an XAI environment identifies research gaps and paves the way for robust medical imaging XAI solutions.Clinical trial number Not applicable.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiagnostic ImagingImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningGraph Neural NetworksHumansDeep learning (DL)Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI)Medical imagingModel interpretabilityPathologyRadiologySaliency maps

Identifiers

PMID41491470
PMCPMC12809972

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.