ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2026
J-shaped association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHHR) and heart failure: a cross-sectional study.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsNon-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHHR), a burgeoning lipid parameter, demonstrates significant predictive value for atherosclerotic and metabolic diseases. However, the correlation of NHHR with heart failure (HF) is still not well established.
methodsBetween 2011 and 2018, this study analyzed NHHR and HF data from 11,639 individuals in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The relationship between HF and NHHR was examined using a multivariate logistic regression model. Results were graphically represented through restricted cubic splines (RCS) model, and threshold effects were evaluated. To further explore the non-linear association, piecewise logistic regression analysis was conducted. Moreover, to confirm the stability of the findings, sensitivity and subgroup analyses were undertaken.
resultsAmong the entire cohort, 433 patients (3.7%) suffered from HF, with a mean age of 47.12 years, a male proportion of 50.6%, and a hypertension prevalence of 30.9%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated notable correlations between HF risk and both the lowest and highest NHHR levels [(NHHR < 2.0 vs. 2.0 ≤ NHHR < 3.0), odds ratio (OR) = 1.693, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.270 to 2.257; (NHHR ≥ 5.0 vs. 2.0 ≤ NHHR < 3.0), OR = 2.591, 95% CI 1.707 to 3.932], which were also supported by subgroup and sensitivity analyses. The RCS model showed the J-shaped relationship between NHHR and HF, characterized by a risk inflection point at 2.58. Piecewise logistic regression analysis demonstrated significant associations between HF risk and NHHR on both sides (< 2.58 and ≥ 2.58) [OR = 0.545, 95% CI 0.394 to 0.755; OR = 1.132, 95% CI 1.040 to 1.232].
conclusionBoth lowest and highest levels of NHHR were significantly associated with HF risk in the United States adults. Moreover, a J-shaped relationship was observed between NHHR and HF risk, with an inflection point at 2.58.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.