Evidence mapPaperPMID 41491633Full record

SynthesisAggressive behavior2026

Interventions for Perpetrators of Intimate Partner Violence: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.

Giulia Punzo, Patrizia Velotti

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Aggressive behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Giulia PunzoDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Patrizia VelottiDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1933-8314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intimate partner violence (IPV) represents a global public health concern, with significant psychological, physical, and social consequences. Numerous interventions have been proposed and evaluated over time to address perpetrator behavior; however, the heterogeneity and variability of outcomes across studies limit the clarity of evidence-based guidance. To address this, the present study conducted an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, aiming to synthesize and critically appraise the highest level of available evidence on interventions targeting IPV perpetrators. A comprehensive search was conducted across five major databases (PsycInfo, PsycArticles, Scopus, PubMed, and MEDLINE), supplemented by Google Scholar and manual bibliographic screening. The initial search yielded 8827 records. After duplicate removal and screening phases, a total of 41 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria. The included studies span a wide range of intervention types, target populations, and outcome measures. This umbrella review highlights key methodological limitations in the literature, varying degrees of effectiveness across intervention modalities, and gaps in long-term outcome evaluations. By providing a high-level synthesis, the findings offer valuable insights for practitioners, policymakers, and researchers, informing the development of more effective and evidence-based strategies for the prevention and reduction of IPV perpetration.

Indexed as

Intimate Partner ViolenceHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topicinterventionsintimate partner violenceIPVperpetratorstreatments

Identifiers

PMID41491633
PMCPMC12770810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.