ArticleJournal of food science2026
Enhancing Gluten-Free Bread With Whole Flours From Forage Palm, Buckwheat, and Teff: Physicochemical Composition, Technological Properties, and Sensory Evaluation.
Article in Journal of food science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing demand for gluten-free foods has driven the formulation of baked products using alternative raw materials to replace wheat. This study aimed to characterize the whole flours of forage palm, teff, and buckwheat, as well as evaluate their performance in gluten-free breads. Proximate analyses of the flours were conducted, in addition to the characterization of the batters and the breads developed. The results indicated that buckwheat flour exhibited the highest protein content (11.58%), forage palm flour stood out for its elevated fiber and ash content (17.92%), and teff flour presented the highest total carbohydrate content (77.06%). Based on the obtained data, optimized bread formulations (with and without teff flours) were developed and subjected to proximate and sensory analyses. Both formulations exhibited similar compositions regarding moisture, proteins, and lipids, although they significantly differed in dietary fiber content, which was higher in the formulation without teff (11.44%) compared to the one with teff (8.56%). Sensory evaluation revealed greater acceptance of the formulation containing teff, attributed to its softer texture and more pronounced flavor. The color of the bread varied subtly due to the presence of forage palm whole flour, without compromising appearance and aroma attributes, which were similarly well rated in both formulations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.