ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Vascular and Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visceral arterial disease: imaging features and pattern-based evaluation on CT angiography.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Conjunctival Vascular Metrics Using Automated Vessel Detection from Slit Lamp Images for Hyperemia Severity Assessment.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence CT Texture Radiomics for Outcome Prediction After EVAR: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown remarkable success in diagnostic radiology through advanced pattern recognition capabilities, yet its application in vascular interventional radiology (VIR) remains limited due to smaller, more variable datasets. This review examines AI applications in VIR procedures that utilize imaging modalities as input across preprocedural, intraprocedural, and post-procedural stages. A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified studies employing AI models with direct patient care impact, categorized by imaging modality (CT, MRI, fluoroscopy/DSA, ultrasound, X-ray, and multimodal) and task type (segmentation, detection, prediction, and miscellaneous). AI demonstrated substantial promise across multiple VIR domains. Deep learning models achieved high Dice similarity coefficients (0.82-0.962) for anatomical structure segmentation including aortic dissections and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Detection tasks showed excellent performance with accuracies up to 95% for endoleak detection and AUCs reaching 0.97 for vessel stenosis identification. Prediction models frequently outperformed traditional clinical assessments, with AUCs exceeding 0.90 for outcomes after EVAR, TEVAR, TACE, and TARE procedures. Radiomics-based approaches combined with machine learning proved particularly effective for treatment response prediction and risk stratification. Despite challenges including limited dataset sizes, potential bias, and interpretability concerns, AI shows transformative potential in VIR. Continued clinician AI expert collaboration will be crucial for responsible deployment and optimization of patient care in interventional radiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491740What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.