Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41491740›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Imaging-Based Artificial Intelligence in Vascular and Interventional Radiology: A Narrative Review.

Haseeb Mukhtar, Ali Ganjizadeh, Ajay Misra, Jamie Kane, Ping Wang, Prabh G Singh, Alaura Lemieux, Gaurav Baranwal, Sreenivasulu Kilari, Bradley J Erickson and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Haseeb MukhtarDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ali GanjizadehDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ajay MisraDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jamie KaneDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ping WangDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Prabh G SinghDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alaura LemieuxDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Gaurav BaranwalDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sreenivasulu KilariDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Bradley J EricksonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sanjay MisraDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. misra.sanjay@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5662-796X

Funding

The Role of Hypoxia In Venous Neointimal Hyperplasia In Hemodialysis GraftsR01HL098967 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sanjay Misra · 2010 to 2026
$10.4M
Monocyte chemoattractant Proteins and Vascular InjuryR01DK135407 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sanjay Misra · 2023 to 2026
$2.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS HL098967NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098967NIDDK NIH HHS DK135407NIDDK NIH HHS DK139817NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK135407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown remarkable success in diagnostic radiology through advanced pattern recognition capabilities, yet its application in vascular interventional radiology (VIR) remains limited due to smaller, more variable datasets. This review examines AI applications in VIR procedures that utilize imaging modalities as input across preprocedural, intraprocedural, and post-procedural stages. A comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science identified studies employing AI models with direct patient care impact, categorized by imaging modality (CT, MRI, fluoroscopy/DSA, ultrasound, X-ray, and multimodal) and task type (segmentation, detection, prediction, and miscellaneous). AI demonstrated substantial promise across multiple VIR domains. Deep learning models achieved high Dice similarity coefficients (0.82-0.962) for anatomical structure segmentation including aortic dissections and abdominal aortic aneurysms. Detection tasks showed excellent performance with accuracies up to 95% for endoleak detection and AUCs reaching 0.97 for vessel stenosis identification. Prediction models frequently outperformed traditional clinical assessments, with AUCs exceeding 0.90 for outcomes after EVAR, TEVAR, TACE, and TARE procedures. Radiomics-based approaches combined with machine learning proved particularly effective for treatment response prediction and risk stratification. Despite challenges including limited dataset sizes, potential bias, and interpretability concerns, AI shows transformative potential in VIR. Continued clinician AI expert collaboration will be crucial for responsible deployment and optimization of patient care in interventional radiology.

Indexed as

ImagingInterventional radiologyMachine learning

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.