SynthesisJournal of occupational rehabilitation2026
Effectiveness of Self-Help Interventions to Reduce Work Disability: A Rapid Mixed Methods Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-Management Interventions and Work Participation in Individuals with Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Scoping Review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the effectiveness of self-help interventions in reducing work disability and improving work- and health-related outcomes among individuals with musculoskeletal, anxiety, and/or depressive conditions; to explore lived experiences with self-help interventions; and to integrate quantitative and qualitative findings to guide future research and implementation.
methodsWe conducted a rapid mixed methods systematic review following World Health Organization (WHO) and Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group guidance. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-experimental, qualitative, and mixed methods studies published in English since 2007. Eligible studies evaluated self-help interventions targeting musculoskeletal, anxiety, and/or depressive conditions in working-age adults (18-65 years). Quantitative outcomes included functioning, return-to-work, productivity, and self-efficacy; qualitative outcomes reflected user experiences. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2, ROBINS-I, and CASP tools. Findings were synthesized narratively by intervention types and outcome domain.
resultsEight studies met inclusion criteria: five RCTs, two quasi-experimental, and one qualitative. All seven quantitative studies were rated high risk of bias. Short-term improvements were observed in disability and physical quality of life in two exercise-based trials, but effects on work participation were inconsistent and generally below thresholds for clinical importance. Cognitive-behavioral and psychoeducational programs produced small improvements in self-efficacy and presenteeism, and relaxation and educational interventions showed no meaningful effects. The qualitative study highlighted workplace barriers such as productivity pressures and limited opportunities for movement that constrained engagement.
conclusionSelf-help interventions may modestly improve self-management, disability, and coping in the short term but show limited and inconsistent evidence for reducing work disability. Their effectiveness likely depends on adherence, contextual support, and integration into workplace environments. Future high-quality, co-designed, context-sensitive studies are needed to clarify effectiveness, safety, and sustainability in real-world settings. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023472934, registered on October 16, 2023; modified March 17 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41491900What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.