ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Identification of histological carotid plaque vulnerability by CT angiography using perivascular adipose tissue radiomics signature.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to develop a radiomics model based on carotid perivascular adipose tissue (PVAT) from CT angiography to identify histologically confirmed vulnerable plaques in patients with carotid artery stenosis (CAS). MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this prospective cohort study, we enrolled patients with CAS scheduled for carotid endarterectomy between 2014 and 2023. Histological plaque assessment served as the reference standard for vulnerability. We developed three models: the PVAT attenuation model, the conventional plaque feature model, and the PVAT radiomics model using features extracted from segmented CT images and machine learning. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration, and decision curve analysis across training, validation, and independent testing from three different scanners. Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP), a tool that quantifies the contribution of each feature to the model's predictions, was used to enhance model interpretability.
resultsWe included 122 patients (mean age 66.45 years, 81.97% male, 63.11% vulnerable). In the training, validation, and testing sets, the PVAT radiomics model predicts an AUC of vulnerability of 0.945, 0.819, and 0.817, respectively, while the plaque score model showed an AUC of 0.688, 0.799, and 0.497, and the PVAT attenuation model showed an AUC of 0.667, 0.708, and 0.493, respectively. The PVAT radiomics model outperforms the PVAT attenuation model (p = 0.01) and plaque score models (p = 0.03) in the test set. SHAP analysis highlighted significant predictors such as logarithm_firstorder_RootMeanSquared.
conclusionsThe PVAT radiomics model is a promising non-invasive tool for identifying vulnerable carotid plaques, offering superior diagnostic efficacy and generalizability across different imaging equipment. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The carotid PVAT radiomics identified histologically vulnerable plaques before surgery through an interpretable and generalizable machine-learning model, beneficial for risk stratification and surgical decision-making. KEY POINTS: Noninvasive and effective identification of histological carotid vulnerable plaques is challenging. The PVAT radiomics outperforms conventional imaging biomarkers in identifying vulnerable plaques. The PVAT radiomic model is generalizable across scanners and interpretable, assisting clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.