ArticleScientific reports2026
Hybrid framework for lesion-aware, clinically coherent chest X-ray report generation using contrastive learning and large language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automated radiology report generation from chest X-rays (CXRs) has the potential to reduce the workload of radiologists and improve diagnostic consistency. However, conventional approaches have been constrained by trade-offs between understanding global images and characterizing fine-grained lesions, often leading to omissions or clinically inconsistent narratives. This study proposed a hybrid framework, CLALA-Net, to integrate global and regional representations through three key modules: Lesion Cross-Attention (LCA), Lesion-Level Contrastive Learning (LLCL), and Image-Text Contrastive Learning (ITCL). LCA injects lesion-level cues derived from full-image classification into each region of interest (ROI), LLCL enhances discriminability by aligning lesion representations across CXRs, and ITCL improves visual-textual semantic alignment. A large language model (LLM)-based aggregator was utilized to consolidate ROI-level descriptions into a clinically coherent report. An LLM-driven label extraction pipeline was introduced to generate fine-grained lesion annotations for training and evaluation. Extensive experiments on the Chest-Imagenome dataset demonstrated that CLALA-Net outperformed existing baselines in both lesion-level accuracy (mean F1-score: 0.40) and report-level consistency (total score: 14.32/20). Ablation studies confirmed the complementary roles of LCA and LLCL, whereas the sensitivity analysis indicated strong performance gains with improved label quality. By bridging full-image contextual reasoning with regional-level lesion analysis, CLALA-Net produced accurate, semantically consistent, and clinically reliable chest radiography reports. This framework provides a robust and interpretable foundation for the real-world deployment of automated radiological reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.