ArticleBehavior research methods2026
Comparing aperiodic activity in consumer-grade and research-grade EEG: Reliability and association with mathematical ability.
Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electroencephalography (EEG) provides valuable insights into brain development, but collecting high-quality data can be tedious, limiting its usability with children. This study evaluates the feasibility and reliability of EEG data acquisition in children with a wireless consumer-grade EEG headset (EMOTIV EPOC X), by comparing it to a research-grade system (BioSemi ActiveTwo), with a focus on aperiodic brain activity. The portability of the EMOTIV headset allows for EEG data collection in ecologically valid, real-world settings such as schools, enabling novel insights into brain activity during learning. We recorded EEG from 93 children (aged 9-10 years) using the EMOTIV headset, beginning with a 4-min resting-state measurement, followed by assessments of mathematical ability, visuospatial working memory, and verbal working memory, in a classroom environment. Aperiodic activity, thought to reflect fundamental aspects of neural excitability and cognitive processing, was extracted and its reliability compared across the two EEG systems. We further tested whether aperiodic activity recorded with EMOTIV predicts mathematical ability, replicating earlier research using research-grade EEG equipment. Our findings reveal that, similar to earlier findings, lower aperiodic activity was associated with higher math performance, supporting its role as a neural marker of cognitive ability. These results demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of using a consumer-grade mobile EEG headset to investigate individual differences in cognitive development in naturalistic contexts. This work opens up new opportunities for large-scale, school-based neurocognitive assessments and paves the way for personalized educational approaches based on neural profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.