ArticleJMIR medical education2026
AI Literacy Among Chinese Medical Students: Cross-Sectional Examination of Individual and Environmental Factors.
Article in JMIR medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI literacy and ethical attitudes toward AI in medical students: evidence from a structural model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The AI adoption paradox in Chinese medical education: a multi-institution cross-sectional study of usage patterns, critical literacy gaps, and adoption profiles among 3,194 undergraduate medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Personality, usage, and perceptions of AI in medical education: evidence from senior pre-clinical students in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy is increasingly essential for medical students. However, without systematic characterization of the relevant components, designing targeted medical education interventions may be challenging. Objective: This study aimed to systematically describe the levels of and factors associated with multidimensional AI literacy among Chinese medical students. Methods: A cross-sectional, descriptive analysis was conducted using data from a nationwide survey of Chinese medical students (N=80,335) across 109 medical schools in 2024. AI literacy was assessed with a multidimensional instrument comprising three domains: knowledge, evaluating students' self-reported proficiency in core areas of medical AI applications; attitude, reflecting their self-perceived views on using AI for teaching and learning; and behavior, capturing the self-perceived usage frequency and application patterns. Multivariate linear regression was applied to examine the associations between individual factors (ie, demographic characteristics, family background, and enrollment motivation) and environmental factors (ie, educational phase, type of education program, and tier of education program) and AI literacy. Results: Respondents showed moderate to high levels of AI knowledge (mean 76.0, SD 26.9), followed by moderate AI attitude scores (mean 71.6, SD, 24.4). In contrast, AI behavior scores were much lower (mean 32.5, SD, 28.5), indicating little usage of AI tools. Of the individual factors, male students reported higher levels of AI attitude and behavior; both intrinsic and extrinsic motivation were positively associated with all three dimensions; advantaged family background was positively related to AI attitude and behavior, but not knowledge. Among the environmental factors, attending the prestigious Double First-Class universities was positively associated with higher AI usage. Enrollment in long-track medical education programs was associated with higher AI attitude and behavior, while being in the clinical phase was negatively associated with both AI knowledge and behavior. Environmental factors moderated the associations between individual characteristics and AI literacy, potentially attenuating disparities. Conclusions: Medical students reported moderate to high AI knowledge, moderate AI favorability, and low AI use. Individual characteristics and environmental factors were significantly associated with AI literacy, and environmental factors moderated the associations. The moderate AI literacy overall highlights the need for AI-related medical education, ideally with practical use and nuanced by socioeconomic factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.