Evidence mapPaperPMID 41493939Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Health service access for ethnically underrepresented communities: A scoping review of complex interventions.

Jessica Rose Pawson, Simon Cannon, Saira Nazeer, Caroline Phillpott, Tadala Kolawole, Joanna Fletcher, Alison Thomson, Jamie Ross, Katie Jane Sheehan, Gillian Woolhead

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jessica Rose PawsonBone & Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5862-6805
Simon CannonTherapies department, Barts Health NHS Trust.
Saira NazeerTherapies department, Barts Health NHS Trust.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9665-8957
Caroline PhillpottTherapies department, Barts Health NHS Trust.
Tadala KolawoleTherapies department, Barts Health NHS Trust.
Joanna FletcherOrthopaedic Research department, Barts Health NHS Trust.
Alison ThomsonWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London.
Jamie RossWolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London.
Katie Jane SheehanBone & Joint Health, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University of London.
Gillian WoolheadDepartment of Health Sciences, Brunel University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this scoping review is to systematically map the existing evidence of complex interventions used to improve access and/or engagement of ethnically underrepresented communities with healthcare services in the UK, and explore equity factors of the evidence.

methodsThe review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. Six databases were searched. Analysis was completed using reflexive and thematic content analysis. Interventions were mapped against the five domains of the Patient-centred access framework and the PROGRESS-Plus equity framework.

resultsA total of 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies 63% were completed in primary care, 31% in mental health, 3% in maternity services and 3% in dental care. Several communities were represented, including Gypsy, Roma and Travellers, African Caribbeans, Jewish communities, as well as broader groups such as South Asians, migrants and Muslims. Complex interventions were spread across the five domains of the patient centred access framework and included strategies such as outreach workers, using community settings such as places of worship, cultural adaptations and cultural training for healthcare staff. Effectiveness of interventions was assessed in a third of studies. PROGRESS-Plus analysis identified exclusion criteria including age groups (e.g., below 18 years), ethnic groups (e.g., not first-generation migrants), disabilities (e.g., severe mental health problems) and plus (e.g., language proficiency).

conclusionsAll domains of the patient centred access framework were represented with approachability and acceptability being the most common. Effectiveness assessment was not included in two thirds of studies however, complex interventions show promise to improve equity in ethnically underrepresented communities. Future research should endeavour to assess effectiveness and the translation of interventions in healthcare contexts outside of primary care and mental health. Future policy and research should consider how to increase transparency of power and build strong collaborations with underrepresented communities.

Indexed as

EthnicityHealth Services AccessibilityMinority GroupsHumansUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID41493939
PMCPMC12773815

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.