ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning-based multimodal biomarkers enable accurate diagnosis and early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
While there has been some progress on discovering clinically validated biomarkers for early detection in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), several challenges remain. Most approaches rely on single-modality biomarkers with limited sensitivity and/or specificity. Using data from a multicenter study with an age-matched cohort (n = 203 with healthy controls n = 46, pancreatitis controls n = 36, and diagnosed cases n = 121), we developed a machine learning approach integrating 2,096 microRNAs, 125 metabolites, and CA19-9. Our method performs unsupervised selection of an optimal subset of biomarkers with maximal discriminatory power for diagnosis and early detection. In training data, the selected biomarker panel achieved [Formula: see text] area under the curve (AUC) and [Formula: see text] sensitivity when controlling specificity at [Formula: see text]. The classification results under the selected multimodal panel generalize well for validation samples. The panel outperforms recently proposed microRNA-based approaches and identifies key biomarkers (such as aminobutyric acid and homovanillic acid) with high classification importance. Decision tree–based cut-offs are derived to enhance clinical interpretability, revealing the association between the low aminobutyric acid level and non-cancer status. These results highlight the superior discriminative ability and interpretability of the proposed multimodal biomarker panel, offering a promising tool for PDAC diagnosis and early detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.