ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Chronic skin damage from UV radiation].
Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is the primary risk factor for the development of both melanocytic and nonmelanocytic skin cancer. In particular, UVA and UVB radiation are the main cause for DNA damage and inflammatory responses that promote tumor formation, thus, contributing to the development of basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma. Furthermore, repeated exposure to UV light accelerates premature skin aging (photoaging), resulting in visible structural changes. In recent years, the incidence of skin cancer in Germany has been steadily increasing. Preventive measures, in addition to regular screening examinations, play a crucial role. This includes UV avoidance, consistent use of protective clothing, and the application of appropriate sunscreens. Dermatologists have the crucial responsibility to educate patients about the effects of UV exposure and to promote effective protection strategies. In this regard, personalized approaches to sun protection will continue to play an increasingly important role. Future UV protection concepts will be tailored to take into consideration individual factors such as skin type and genetic predisposition, as well as exposomal influences. These factors would then be further evaluated using artificial intelligence to enable truly personalized sun protection. This personalized approach aligns with the broader trend toward precision medicine but also presents scientific, ethical, and practical challenges. Responsible implementation will therefore be essential to ensure these innovations are applied safely and equitably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41495244What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.