ReviewJournal of molecular histology2026
Molecular docking in histological biomarker discovery and disease modeling: techniques, validation, and translational perspectives.
Review in Journal of molecular histology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In an era where precision medicine demands rapid innovation, molecular docking has emerged as a cornerstone technology that transforms the study of histological biomarkers and disease biology. This review provides a comprehensive overview of molecular docking techniques applied to the exploration of histological biomarkers across diverse disease models. Contemporary approaches such as AutoDock, FlexX, SwissDock, PyRx, Surflex, and ICM, as well as molecular dynamics simulations are discussed in relation to their role in identifying and validating ligand interactions with key protein targets, including SREBP, PPAR-α, FXR, MAO-B, α-synuclein, and HAT. The utility of docking is examined in the context of liver fibrosis, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and metabolic disorders, highlighting how in silico screening accelerates the discovery of potential therapeutics such as silymarin, ursolic acid, quercetin, berberine, and diallyl trisulfide. Studies integrating docking with in vitro and in vivo validation demonstrate improved targeting of disease-relevant proteins and the prediction of binding affinities, supporting personalized medicine and drug repurposing. Virtual screening reduces experimental workload by efficiently identifying promising candidates. It also elucidates multi-target interactions and enhances understanding of underlying mechanisms, as demonstrated by data from recent literature. Overall, molecular docking emerges as a crucial tool for mapping disease mechanisms, prioritizing therapeutic candidates, and guiding biomarker-driven drug development in modern biomedical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41495278What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.