Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495338›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026

Applications of machine learning and natural language processing to neurocognitive outcomes in posttreatment cancer survivors: a scoping review.

Salome Alfaro, Jessica Liu, Cristina Naranjo Ortiz, Alejandro Alfaro, Maryam Lustberg

Abstract readScoping Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Salome AlfaroYale University, New Haven, CT, USA. salome.alfaro@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6514-3253
Jessica LiuYale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2723-345X
Cristina Naranjo OrtizYale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2382-3689
Alejandro AlfaroDuke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4563-4784
Maryam LustbergMedical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, Yale Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8559-5645

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis scoping review explores how machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) are used to detect, characterize, and predict neurocognitive symptoms in cancer survivors across age groups. The review had two goals: (1) to compare ML and NLP applications in understanding cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) among age-stratified survivors and (2) to identify research gaps that could inform future survivorship care.

methodsFollowing PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar from 2014 to 2025. Studies were included if they used ML or NLP to assess neurocognitive outcomes in posttreatment cancer survivors. Studies without defined ML/NLP methods, a survivorship focus, or peer review were excluded.

resultsThe final review included 27 studies with 3584 participants. Most studies used supervised ML models such as random forest and support vector machines. Key applications included predicting patient-reported outcomes and identifying biomarkers via neuroimaging. Most studies focused on adult survivors, with limited research in older adult (n = 4), AYA (n = 1), and pediatric (n = 3) populations specifically, despite their high risk for long-term CRCI.

conclusionML and NLP show promise for CRCI detection. Future research should prioritize developing age-specific ML/NLP models for underrepresented populations, particularly older adults, AYA, and pediatric survivors, while establishing standardized validation frameworks. Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration and integration into clinical workflows will be essential for effective implementation.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsCognitive DysfunctionMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingNeoplasmsAge FactorsHumansAdolescent and young adults (AYA)Cancer-related cognitive impairmentCancer survivorshipMachine learningNatural language processingNeurocognitive impairment

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.