Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495415›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Enhanced colorectal gland segmentation through multi-scale attention and contextual feature fusion.

Ponnarasee B K, Lalithamani N, Adeyemi Abel Ajibesin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ponnarasee B KDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Coimbatore, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India.
Lalithamani NDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Amrita School of Computing, Coimbatore, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, India. n_lalitha@cb.amrita.edu.
Adeyemi Abel AjibesinDepartment of IT, Faculty of Informatics & Design, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Histological image segmentation of colorectal cancer plays a crucial role in reliable cancer grading, prognosis evaluation, and treatment planning. Nevertheless, existing automated approaches often struggle due to fine-grained glandular structures, staining variations, acquisition differences across scanners and highly heterogeneous tissue morphology. To address these challenges, we propose MAC-Net, an enhanced deep learning model that integrates multi-scale feature fusion with attention-guided contextual decoding to achieve precise gland segmentation across diverse tumor differentiation stages. MAC-Net retains fine structural information by channel-wise attention, enhances learning of discriminative features by the increased number of enriched encoder-decoder lateral connections, and the global contextual information, by means of multi-scale spatial pooling at the bottleneck. To determine the generalizability of the model, we trained the model on the EBHI-Seg data (2228 images) and cross-validated it on the GIaS data (165 images). MAC-Net achieved 95.08% Dice, 90.92% IoU, 95.83% Precision, and 95.65% Recall, outperforming existing architectures. Furthermore, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping visualization and uncertainty analysis enhance interpretability, provides deeper insight on model's transparent behavior and supports reliable clinical decision-making in the field of digital pathology.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedDeep LearningHumansColorectal cancer segmentationDeep learningExplainable AIHistopathological segmentationHybrid loss

Identifiers

PMID41495415
PMCPMC12858981

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.