ArticleBMC genomics2026
PET microplastics induce lipotoxicity in the porcine pancreas.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Micro- and Nanoplastics as Disruptors of Digestive and Hepatopancreatic Homeostasis: Insights into the Plastic-Gut-Liver Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Microplastics in food production systems: Sources, exposure pathways, and gastrointestinal health effects.Current research in food science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microplastics are a relatively new discovered environmental hazard that can contribute to the disruption of many physiological processes in the organism. There is evidence that they affect the physiology of the pancreas, but research in this area remains limited. Therefore, the aim of the study was to determine the effects of PET microplastics on the global proteomic profile of the pancreas using LC–MS/MS analysis, with the pig as a model organism. The pigs were treated either with a low (0.1 g/day) or a high dose (1 g/day) of PET microplastics for four weeks. The analysis revealed that PET microplastics affected protein abundance in a dose-dependent manner – the low dose altered the abundance of 7 proteins, while the high dose – 17. The differentially regulated proteins were involved in fatty acid biosynthesis (FASN, KAS), lipid peroxidation (CBR1) and digestive enzyme production (trypsinogen). Complementary colorimetric assays confirmed a significant increase in free fatty acids under the influence of a high dose of PET microplastics. Taken together, these results indicate that PET microplastics may affect oxidative status, induce lipotoxic stress and impair pancreatic exocrine function, suggesting a novel pathway through which microplastics may cause metabolic disturbances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.