Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495724›Full record

ReviewBMC public health2026

Physical activity interventions for older adults - an overview of systematic reviews.

Jo Canneaux, Richard A Sharpe, Noreen Orr, Jane R Smith, Alison Bethel, Cassandra Phoenix, Victoria A Goodwin, Iain Lang, Ruth Garside

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jo CanneauxPublic Health, Cornwall Council, Truro, Cornwall, UK.
Richard A SharpeEuropean Centre for the Environment & Human Health, Department of Public Health and Sports Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Peter Lanyon Building, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK.
Noreen OrrFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Jane R SmithFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Alison BethelFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Cassandra PhoenixDepartment of Sport and Exercise Sciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Victoria A GoodwinFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Iain LangFaculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK.
Ruth GarsideEuropean Centre for the Environment & Human Health, Department of Public Health and Sports Science, University of Exeter Medical School, Peter Lanyon Building, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK. r.garside@exeter.ac.uk.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research PB-PG-0214-33020Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT226798/Z/22/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe proportion of people meeting recommended physical activity (PA) guidelines declines with age. Older adults who are physically inactive have an increased risk of: all-cause mortality; chronic diseases; injury and reduced cognitive functioning. Multiple systematic reviews aim to understand the effectiveness of PA interventions but the evidence is fragmented and it is unclear how well the research reflects the needs of older people. We conducted an overview of existing systematic reviews (PROSPERO reference: CRD42015023796) to map evidence on interventions to encourage older people to be more active.

methodsNine electronic databases were searched, most recently in October 2023. Older people were defined as those aged 50+, with physical activity including active daily living (walking the dog, gardening, etc.), organised activities and clubs and more formal exercise or sport. Screening of records, data extraction, and assessments of quality (using AMSTAR-2) and inequality (using Progress-Plus) were completed independently by two reviewers.

resultsA total of 35 reviews (reported in 36 papers) published between 2002 and 2023 were included. Reviews included between 3 and 79 studies (total 480 unique studies) with a median of 162 and 184 participants per study in meta-analyses (overall AMSTAR-2 median quality low) and narrative syntheses (median quality critically low) respectively. Eighteen included a mixture of interventions (e.g. supporting lifestyle change, walking groups, exercise classes), nine focussed on remote delivery, six on wearable devices, five on 1-to-1 interventions, two on walking, and two focussed on group-based interventions. Interventions to increase physical activity in older people were shown to be effective in the short term (< 12 months). The use of wearable devices as interventions had a small-to-medium effect on increasing physical activity and daily steps. Remote delivery approaches, including the use of text messaging, web- or mobile-technology, and social media, were effective in increasing PA.

conclusionsA range of interventions are effective in increasing PA in older adults. Newer research highlights the usefulness of technology - including wearable devices, social media, text messaging - as useful tools. Improved effectiveness seems to relate to theory-based interventions, but without further research, caution should be taken when interpreting the effectiveness of individual behaviour change techniques. Identifying and resolving wider barriers and facilitators, social and environmental interactions influencing PA may improve future interventions. Better reporting of equity by future studies will improve understanding of who benefits from such interventions. Increased knowledge of potential wider social, economic and environmental determinants of physical activity in older adults, and specifically more vulnerable and minority populations, will help policy makers and practitioners develop more effective interventions.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionAgedHumansMiddle AgedSystematic Reviews as TopicOlder peopleOverview of systematic reviewsPhysical activity intervention

Identifiers

PMID41495724
PMCPMC12805782

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.