ArticleBMC public health2026
Community activity intervention reduced sitting time and improved population physical activity levels.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of the Beat the Street intervention; a gamification intervention to promote physical activity, reduce sitting time and improve wellbeing, among residents of Chelmsford and South Woodham Ferrers.
methodsPre-post experimental design of the Beat the Street Intervention. Beat the Street gamifies neighbourhoods, incentivising the community to actively travel, collecting virtual points at sensors on selected lamp posts called ‘Beat Boxes’ advertised on maps and phone applications. Participants were asked to complete a baseline questionnaire after registering, and before the six-week “game phase” of the intervention. A follow-up questionnaire was then completed at the end of the intervention. Mean differences were calculated to provide interpretations of differences. Within-subjects differences for all measures were assessed by Wilcoxon Signed Rank separately for children and adults, followed by each demographic grouping. Significance for all analyses was set at p < 0.05.
resultsNine hundred fifteen (n = 313 children) participants reported sitting time and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity both pre- and post-intervention. For both children and adults overall, there was an increase in reported wellbeing and a reduction in reported sitting time daily and sitting time week, while life satisfaction increased for adults overall. Additionally, the percentage of participants classed as inactive decreased for both children and adults.
conclusionThe present findings suggest that the Beat the Street intervention reduced sitting time and increased physical activity among both children and adults in the short term. Further research is needed to assess the long-term impacts and explore objective measures of sitting time to better understand sustained engagement and outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.