Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41495786›Full record

ArticleVeterinary research2026

Comparative evaluation of histopathological lesions and viral antigen distribution in domestic pigs and wild boar inoculated intranasally with the highly virulent ASFV genotype II strain "Armenia 2007".

Emil Wikström-Lassa, Dolores Gavier-Widén, Fabian Z X Lean, Alejandro Núñez, Bjørnar Ytrehus, Karl Ståhl, Pedro J Sánchez-Cordón, Aleksija Neimanis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Emil Wikström-LassaDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden. emil.wikstrom@sva.se.
Dolores Gavier-WidénDepartment of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Fabian Z X LeanPathology and Animal Sciences Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA-Weybridge), Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, UK.
Alejandro NúñezPathology and Animal Sciences Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA-Weybridge), Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, UK.
Bjørnar YtrehusDepartment of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7028, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Karl StåhlDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Pedro J Sánchez-Cordón *Pathology and Animal Sciences Department, Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA-Weybridge), Woodham Lane, New Haw, Addlestone, KT15 3NB, UK.
Aleksija Neimanis *Department of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, Swedish Veterinary Agency (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.

Funding

Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas 2020-01603VetBioNet VBN-19-33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is a devastating viral disease that affects domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) and European wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa). A previous study indicated that wild boar were more susceptible to ASF than pigs, with shorter incubation periods and earlier onset of the disease. This follow-up study aims to compare the pathogenesis and progression of the disease between the two subspecies during the early and late stages of infection following intranasal inoculation with the highly virulent genotype II strain 'Armenia 2007'. Histopathological changes and viral antigen distribution by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were assessed over time following intranasal inoculation. Viral antigen and histological changes were detected earlier in wild boar than in pigs. In wild boar, the medial retropharyngeal (MRPLN) and submandibular lymph nodes were among the earliest sites of virus replication from 3 days post-infection (dpi), with widespread dissemination occurring by 5 dpi. In pigs, the viral antigen was first detected in the MRPLN at 5 dpi. At the humane endpoint, which occurred at 6 dpi in wild boar and 9 dpi in pigs, virus antigen and histopathological scores were lower in wild boar than in pigs, even though the appearance and increase of viral antigen in tissues, onset and development of lesions and humane endpoint occurred earlier in the former. The lower severity and lesser extent of lesions in wild boar suggest lower tolerance of tissue damage prior to reaching the humane endpoint, demonstrating their greater susceptibility to and lower resistance against ASFV.

Indexed as

African Swine FeverAfrican Swine Fever VirusAntigens, ViralSus scrofaAnimalsGenotypeSwineVirulenceAntigens, ViralAfrican swine fever virusdomestic pigshistopathologyimmunohistochemistrySus scrofavirus antigen distributionwild boar

Identifiers

PMID41495786
PMCPMC12849611

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.