ReviewTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2026
Schistosoma japonicum infection: clinical significance of ultrasound findings.
Review in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epidemiological and Clinical-Laboratorial Profile of Schistosomiasis in an Endemic Urban Area in Pernambuco, Brazil.Acta parasitologica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Schistosoma japonicum infection can cause severe hepatic complications associated with portal hypertension, which may lead to death by bleeding from esophageal varices. Ultrasonography (US) enables the identification of two different types of liver fibrosis characteristic for S. japonicum infection: interseptal fibrosis (ISF) and portal fibrosis (PF). To date, these two forms of liver fibrosis have not been sufficiently investigated with regard to their potential to cause portal hypertension. Among the 121 reports published, only 56 (46.3%) distinguish between ISF and PF. In 31/56 (55.4%) of these publications, patients with only ISF, two (3.6%) with only PF, as well as 23 (41.1%) with concomitant ISF and PF, are reported. US signs of portal hypertension are reported in 10/25 (40.0%) of publications reporting PF, of which 2/2 (100%) of publications report PF alone and 8/23 (34.8%) of publications report concurrent PF and ISF. Also, 2/31 (6.5%) of publications report that ISF alone is associated with portal hypertension. Thus, PF appears to be the main risk factor for portal hypertension. Future studies need to assess the exact nature of liver fibrosis caused by S. japonicum in a standardized way to clarify the individual contributions of PF and ISF to morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.