ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Identifying health conditions in older adults in textual health records using deep learning-based natural language processing.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many clinically significant health conditions in older adults are underreported or only recorded in unstructured health records. These records, however, contain valuable information for patient care and prognosis. This study utilized 10.6 million free-text entries from the electronic health records of 102,525 patients aged 50-80 across various care settings in Finland from 2010 to 2022. A deep learning-based natural language processing model was employed to perform named entity recognition (NER) to identify falls, incontinence, loneliness, and mobility limitations from the free-text entries. The performance of the NER models was evaluated by precision, recall and F1 scores. Diagnostic codes for incontinence and falls were collected for comparisons. Cox regression models were used to assess the predictive value of the identified conditions for all-cause mortality. The NER models demonstrated excellent performance with recall, precision and F1 scores greater than 0.80 across the health conditions. Compared to diagnostic codes, NER identified greater numbers of falls (31987 vs 4090) and incontinence (7059 vs 3873) onsets and yielded greater hazard ratios for all-cause mortality: 1.31 vs 1.04 for falls and 1.99 vs 0.65 for incontinence. Deep learning-based NER models present new opportunities to identify vulnerable patients in free text health records.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.