ArticleBiochemistry and biophysics reports2026
How do vibration stimulation frequencies affect the nonlinear dynamics and mechanical characterization of breast cancer cells?
Article in Biochemistry and biophysics reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Understanding the mechanical properties of cells is crucial for gaining insights into their physiological and pathological states. This study focuses on the mechanical behavior of human mammary epithelial cells (MCF-10) and human breast cancer cells (MCF-7), emphasizing mechanical frequencies, finite element modeling (FEM), and nonlinear dynamics of the cells. Methods: Cells were cultured and subjected to mechanical testing using Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Magnetic Tweezer Cytometry (MTC). The elastic and viscoelastic properties were analyzed, and FEMs were developed to simulate cell behavior under various mechanical stimuli. The nonlinear dynamic behavior was examined using the Duffing model, and chaos was assessed using the Largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE). Results: MCF-10 cells exhibited higher stiffness than MCF-7 cells. The mechanical frequencies of both cell types were determined, and significant differences were observed at higher frequencies. FEM simulations provided detailed insights into the stress distribution and deformation patterns within cells. The nonlinear analysis revealed chaotic behavior at specific frequencies, particularly in the range of 22-36 kHz. Conclusion: Identifying the mechanical frequencies and responses of cancer cells, including their nonlinear and chaotic behaviors, can inform the development of noninvasive therapeutic strategies. Further research is required to refine these models and explore the potential of mechanical forces in cancer treatment
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.