Evidence mapPaperPMID 41497124Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Outcomes of lower extremity revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in diabetic and non-diabetic patients: a comparative study.

Aram Baram, Emad Erfan Najim, Hawsar Abdalrazaq Raouf, Ahmed Shakhawan Kadir

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aram BaramCollege of Medicine, Branch of Clinical sciences, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9217-1189
Emad Erfan NajimBranch of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
Hawsar Abdalrazaq RaoufBranch of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.
Ahmed Shakhawan KadirBranch of Clinical Sciences, College of Medicine, University of Sulaimani, Sulaymaniyah, Iraq.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Peripheral arterial disease is characterized by impaired perfusion to the lower limbs, primarily due to atherosclerosis. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the short - and long-term outcomes of femoropopliteal bypass revascularization using autologous veins in diabetic and non-diabetic patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Patients and methods: A single-center, retrospective, comparative study was conducted over a 10-year period (1 July 2013 to 1 July 2023), involving 300 patients (150 diabetics, 150 non-diabetics), all diagnosed with CLTI. All patients underwent femoropopliteal bypass using primarily autologous great saphenous vein (GSV) conduits. Clinical presentation, perioperative outcomes, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and quality of life (VASCUQoL-6) scores were assessed at regular intervals over a 36-month follow-up. Results: Both groups had similarly poor preoperative ABI scores (mean 0.3 in diabetics, 0.33 in non-diabetics). At 12 months, ABI outcomes were comparable across both groups, with no significant difference in distribution. Diabetic patients had higher re-intervention (29.3%) and major amputation rates (12.7%) compared to non-diabetics (18.7% and 7.3%, respectively), but also achieved a slightly higher limb salvage rate (69.3% vs 66.7%). VASCUQoL-6 scores improved significantly in both groups, with average scores rising from 4 to 5 preoperatively to ≥20 by 36 months. Mortality and complication rates, including surgical site infections, were similar. Conclusion: Femoropopliteal bypass using autologous vein grafts offers effective long-term outcomes for diabetic and non-diabetic CLTI patients. While diabetic patients faced higher risks of re-intervention and amputation, limb salvage and quality-of-life improvements were comparable. Open surgery remains a valuable revascularization option in selected CLTI patients.

Identifiers

PMID41497124
PMCPMC12768176

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.