Evidence mapPaperPMID 41497159Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Contemporary management strategies for spinal metastases: diagnosis, multidisciplinary approaches, and outcomes - a narrative review.

Kanav Gupta, Sonal Gupta, Rakesh Dua, Shivanya Singh, Kavya Gupta, Bipin Chaurasia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Surgical management of spinal metastases].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kanav GuptaDepartment of Neurosurgery, AIIMS Jammu, Jammu, India.
Sonal GuptaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fortis Hospital, Shalimar bagh, Jammu, India.
Rakesh DuaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Fortis Hospital, Shalimar bagh, Jammu, India.
Shivanya SinghDepartment of Oncoanesthesia and Palliative Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Jammu, India.
Kavya GuptaEpidemiology and Public Health SKUAST Jammu, Jammu, India.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, College of Medical Sciences, Bharatpur, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8392-2072

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Spinal metastases occur in 30%-70% of cancer patients, with approximately 10%-20% experiencing symptomatic manifestations including pain, instability, or neurological deficits. Nearly 20% of patients present with malignant spinal cord compression as their initial manifestation of malignancy. Our objectives were to provide a comprehensive review of contemporary management strategies for spinal metastases, focusing on diagnostic approaches, multidisciplinary treatment frameworks, and surgical interventions that optimize patient functional outcomes and quality of life. Methods: SANRA-guided narrative review of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library (2000-2025). Clinical trials, meta-analyses, consensus statements, and seminal papers were prioritized; purposive selection ensured broad thematic coverage. The analysis encompasses imaging techniques, surgical interventions, and decision-making frameworks including the NOMS (Neurologic, Oncologic, Mechanical, and Systemic) classification system. Results: Within the spinal column, metastases most commonly affect the thoracic region, followed by lumbar and cervical regions. Common primary tumors with high bone metastasis rates include breast (72%), prostate (84%), thyroid (50%), lung (31%), kidney (37%), and pancreas (33%), collectively accounting for more than 80% of spinal metastases cases. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates the advantage of detecting multilevel involvement without radiation exposure. Contemporary management employs a multidisciplinary approach incorporating chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgical interventions. Modern surgical approaches have evolved from historical laminectomy-only procedures to comprehensive decompression with stabilization techniques. Conclusions: Early recognition and prompt intervention remain critical for preventing irreversible neurological deficits and optimizing patient outcomes. Future improvements in molecular targeted therapies, imaging precision, and surgical techniques promise continued enhancement of treatment outcomes for patients with spinal metastases.

Indexed as

metastatic spinal cord compressionminimally invasive surgeryNOMS frameworkradiotherapy (SBRT/SRS)spinal metastases

Identifiers

PMID41497159
PMCPMC12767996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.